Related Video Collections
All Comments
Why do white guys like to pimp out their wives to be in interracial porn videos? Was being a judge with a 6 figure salary not enough for her husband? Was he trying to sell her for the money or do you think he secretly likes black guys and wanted to watch his wife get freaky with one?
ca.news.yahoo.com/s/cbc/100901/ca… | Piss-bottle Jones says
you've obviously never seen ghetto gaggers, it cuts both ways | For white-brown interracial couples: What do caucasian wives think of their Filipino husbands? And I mean Filipino guys who grew up in the Philippines with all those values and stuff
:) | Since they got married, then I suppose just like how any wife would think her husband.
c", | I am in shock! I just caught my wife in an interracial gang bang. How can I learn to live with this? I not only fear disease, but that she may get pregnant and everyone will know the babby is not mine. Should I just leave her, or learn to be open to this? | Meah... wots news. You should have seen her last weekend when the circus was in town.
Good job on the q.
Perfect. Men should get bonus points. | POLL: How come zac efron and vanessa hudgens is called INTERRACIAL ? but obama and his wife is not called interracial?
why is that? Obama is not black he is MIXED, and Vanessa is not white she is also MIXED. | | I never knew Vanessa was mixed. Or Obama, I thought he was all black. | When will they start showing more interracial couples in the media, and on television commercials? Racial diversity is the fabric of American culture but the media rarely reflects the reality of interracial marriages and families. There are over 200,000 interracial marriages in the U.S. between white men and black women and I wouldn't mind seeing more of it portrayed in the mass media.
My wife and I have been married since 2003 and we have 2 beautiful daughters ages 3, and 4...and it would be great to see more couples like ours on mainstream TV.
Is it still considered taboo in some way? | | well some people are still against it, especially people 30+. they were raised without interracial couples, and most people 30+ control the media. i dont really like interracial couples cuz i believe u lose ur heritage and everyone gets mixed up and soon there wont be any "pure dutch" or "pure japanese" left. idk its just my opinion, bring on the thumbs down if u want, but if u think about it, its 100% true. | When will they start showing more interracial couples on television, and in tv commercials? Today's society is made up of racial diversity but television rarely reflects the reality of interracial marriages and families. There are over 200,000 interracial marriages in the U.S. between white men and black women and I wouldn't mind seeing more of it in the media.
My wife and I have been married since 2003 and we have 2 daughters ages 2, and 3...and it would be great to see more couples like that on mainstream TV.
Is it still considered taboo in some way? | | there are tons of interracial commercials on tv when i look | How is life for interracial couples in Detroit/Detroit metro area? My wife and I are relocating to the Detroit area this summer. She is black, and I am white. We wondered what life was like for interracial couples in Detroit and the areas around the city/metro area. | You shouldnt have any problems in the cities, but you might get a lot of stares.
Plus, this is 2010, dont worry about what others think or do, be your self, you live in one of the most open minded countries in the world, you will be fine.
Last, if there are haters, well, nothing a Police report wouldnt solve. | How is interracial marriage and same sex marriage the same? Marrying a member of the same gender is not the same as marrying a person of a different race because race and gender are not parallel, they’re not the same and here’s why. There is no difference between a white human and a black human’s psyche, but there are immense differences between a man and a woman’s psyche. Men and women are equal but not the same. If you are attracted to men and not women (regardless of your gender) you notice that men and women are not the same too, if you are attracted to women and not men (regardless of your gender) you notice that men and women are not the same also.
A lot of these traditional marriage beliefs also have to do with guyren. People who are against same-sex marriage, believe guyren should think when they grow up they will get married, they should not have to think, am I going to marry a boy or a girl? Guyren today face enough sexual confusion without adding that.
When it comes to raising guyren, most people who are pro traditional marriage believe that two men can not replace 1 good mother’s role in a (boy or girl) guy’s development, and believe two women can not replace 1 good father’s role in a (boy or girl) guy’s development. I don’t think two men could replace my mother and give me the things my mother gave me, and I don’t think two women could replace my father and give me the things my father gave me, and that’s how most of the people who are against gay marriage feel. Thinking men and women both have different, but equally important qualities, is legit.
The argument is some homosexuals believe in same sex marriage, since gays are discriminated against they feel we should redefine marriage, because they feel it is their civil right to have their relationships honored in the law, they use Loving vs. Virginia (the 1967 supreme court case where interracial marriage was legalized) as a point of reference, and they feel not giving it to them is a violation of their civil rights, but the same argument could be said for Muslims and polygamy.
Some Muslims believe in polygamy, since Muslims are discriminated against should we redefine marriage to where polygamy is legal for consenting adults, because they feel it is their civil right to have their relationships honored in the law, they use Loving vs. Virginia as a point of reference, and they feel not giving it to them is a violation of their civil rights? When people use the separate but equal Loving vs. Virgina case, as an argument to pervert the definition of marriage of man and wife, to man and man or woman and woman, what’s to stop people from using the same argument to deviate further to man, woman and woman or woman, man and man?
The legitimacy of the arguments heterosexuals and homosexuals, have against polygamy in consenting adults, are equivalent to the legitimacy of arguments heterosexuals who are against same sex marriage have. Heterosexuals who are against same sex marriage can be labeled hateful bigots, and as having an irrational fear of homosexuals (homophobic) and by the same logic, the same way, homosexuals and heterosexuals who do not support polygamy can be labeled hateful bigots, and as having an irrational fear of polygamists, the labels in both cases are equivalent in their validity or lack thereof.
There was a church in California covered on CNN that gay protesters were going after because they would not marry 2 homosexuals, a couple months before prop 8 passed. People that are against same sex marriage recognize that if gay marriage is legalized in the United States nationwide, Church’s will be legally required to marry gay couples or they can be sued, loose their licenses and loose their tax exempt status. Teacher’s who teach Human development will be legally required to include gay sex in their curriculum, even if they don’t believe in it, or they’ll loose their job, both instances would be reprehensible. People say same sex marriage is none of straight people’s business, but both of those cases are very much the business of heterosexuals.
For those of you who want to just resort to name calling and personal insults, (because I present a respectful, civil, and legitimate argument) without articulating a response, just leave your stupid comment and move on. | People use the same arguments against interracial marriage that were used 50 years ago. (God didn't intend the races to mix... to be short... the argument was)
No church has been forced to marry homosexuals. You can get a license in court. The issue was that they denied business for a commitment ceremony, not a marriage.
If you bring up the argument of guyren... you are might as well ban having guyren outside of marriage, because you're saying the exact same thing.
The real thing is that the issue of gay-marriage is like the issue of interracial marriage. No one who is against interracial marriage was alright with the relationship, let alone the marriage. You're against the relationship itself, that's your problem and why you are a bigot.
You might as well make being gay illegal... which you can't do, since sex of any type between two consenting adults is their own business.
If you don't support gay marriage, don't marry someone who is gay. If you're neighbors were gay, how would it make any difference to you if they were married or not.
EDIT:
You're the one who brought up the issue of guy-raising. With saying...
"I don’t think two men could replace my mother ..."
My whole point is, you are talking about the issues of a mother and father. When it's not a requirement to have both, much less many people don't.
"because It hasn't been legalized nationwide yet"
You were talking about a commitment ceremony, which all they wanted to do was lease the land their church owned, which they do to hetero couples as well, the problem was they broke a law by denying them because they were gay. A Catholic church can refuse to marry someone of a different belief, no one is forcing ANY church to marry anyone.
"Your putting words in my mouth just the way you put artificial facts in your head"
You can't tell me it's okay for people to be gay and you simply don't want them to be married. You'd be lying if you don't approve of their relationship.
"Once again I did not suggest that you did"
And you could actually share what you think there instead of saying that's not what you suggested, though whether two people are married or not doesn't change how you live your life.
"and you are using the same argument muslims who believe in poligamy can use, I notice you ignore most of the post that refutes your Loving vs. Virginia argument"
Loving v. Virginia was deemed unconstitutional due to restriction on race. My point is that your religion does not make the laws of a secular nation. Just because your god doesn't approve of something, doesn't mean you're going to impede on the rights of others. That's exactly why slavery existed. It was okay, because we never gave them rights in the first place.
The rights of a minority should never be voted on by the majority.
"Fine, call it civil unions and not marriage, my marriage is between a man and a woman, and they are trying to pervert that"
Separate is not equal, we already know that. The real problem is that we are a secular nation, not a theocracy. Your religion doesn't make our laws. That's what you're talking about when you say perversion. Maybe you just don't want to drink from the same water fountain as gays, so you rather give them a separate water fountain.
"Christians are not considered minorities but Muslims are considered minorities, And once again you ignore how I pointed out that race and gender are not the same"
Race and gender are not the same, but sexism and racism are both bigotry. Christians are the majority by numbers, but as I said, the majority doesn't get to make whatever laws they please to enforce on everyone else.
"So are boy scouts and girls scouts separate but equal as well? When I say pervert, I mean the dictionary definition of “to lead astray”"
So suddenly your marriage is not special to you anymore because gays can marry too? And no, boy scouts and girl scouts are not equal, boy scouts don't allow gays and atheists into their organization.
"That’s laughable, considering I never said that, and what would you know about drinking from a separate fountain?"
Just seems to me you think if you're sharing something with people who you deem as less than yourself somehow ruins it for you.
I still bet you can't honestly say it's okay for someone to be gay, just not okay for them to marry. | Was there ever interracial sex with slaves and owner's wives/daughters? This is a serious question and I always wonder about that. I know it's true that the owners impregnated female slaves to sell more babies......but.....has there ever been a case where a male slave secretly had intimate relationships with the owner's daughter or wife? I know you see stuff like this in movies, but did that ever happened in real life in the 1800's? I'm not being racist or trying to start trouble, so please don't take my question the wrong way. This is something I wanted to know. | Generally, interacial sex was limited to the male owner & a particular female slave. It was commonplace enough that it was unofficially accepted that an owner would have a wife & guys, yet have a mulatto/***** mistress on the side, and, plausibly, offspring from that hook-up. The law did not recognize such an arrangement, and white society in some slave-holding cultures begrudgingly accepted it with a 'boys will be boys' attitude. But it was considered something you hid waaaaay in the backrooms, not something you flaunted in front of 'polite' society.
OFFICIALLY white women were prohibited from having any kind of relations with 'the help'.
Undoubtably there were hookups but the consequences were most likely severe on both parties, with the slave likely facing torture & capital punishment for the affair.
Not exactly the stuff of romance novels.
btw, apparently YahooAnswers has an issue with the word "n e g r o" | Why do white men stare at my interracial relationship in public? I am a black man in an interracial relationship with a white woman living in the suburbs. My white woman is blonde, greenish gray eyes, has a slight tan with a skinny body. She looks like a model. Now my problem is every time i am out in public white men give my women these condescending stares. Just the other day my wife had to tell this white man off because of his staring. Why do they stare at us so much? Is there something they want from us? | | because people are judgemental and im sure black people stare at you to. |
|